Legal Opinion

Holder v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1954No. 8 Div. 760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL. Justice.

Plaintiffs, C. R. Holder and wife, sued on a promissary note and defendant having filed several pleas, the cause came on for trial. Plaintiffs offered the note in evidence while their first witness was on the stand and the court sustained objections to its introduction. Plaintiffs amended the complaint and the court again sustained objections of defendant, whereupon plaintiffs took a non-suit on the adverse ruling of the court and appealed to this court.

The amended count reads:

“The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of $1019.44 due by promissory note made by him on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Preslar v. StallworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  2. Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Thrasher v. NeeleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Scott v. McGriffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Hogan v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. TrammellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Alabama General InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Ex Parte DiamondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Tanton v. Morgan Distributing Co. (In re Cauley)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API