Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Stirling

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 22, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00540Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Kimmie Heaton, ) Civil Action No. 2:19-0540-RMG ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER AND OPINION ) Brian Stirling, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Dkt. No. 127) that the motion for summary judgment brought by Defendants Ezike, Hawthorne, Marshall, McRee and Stirling (the “Stirling Defendants”) be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the Court adopts in part the R & R as the order of the Court. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. LesterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API