Legal Opinion

United States v. Coe

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 29, 1894No. 591PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. Motion to dismiss for want, of jurisdiction. The case was as follows: On March 3,1891, an act of Congress was approved, entitled “ An act to establish a Court of Private Land Claims, and to provide for the settlement of private land claims in certain States and Territories.” 26 Stat. 854, c. 539. By the first section it was provided: “ That there shall be, and hereby is, established a court to be called the Court of Private Land…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. Motion to dismiss for want, of jurisdiction. The case was as follows: On March 3,1891, an act of Congress was approved, entitled “ An act to establish a Court of Private Land Claims, and to provide for the settlement of private land claims in certain States and Territories.” 26 Stat. 854, c. 539. By the first section it was provided: “ That there shall be, and hereby is, established a court to be called the Court of Private Land Claims, to consist of a Chief Justice and-four Associate Justices, who shall be, when appointed, citizens and residents'…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

The motion to dismiss rests upon two grounds : 1. That the Congress had no power to confer upon this court jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the decree of the Court of Private Land Claims because the latter is not vested with judicial power in virtue of any provision of the Constitution. 2. That if this be not so, nevertheless the act creating that court, in prescribing the course of procedure upon appeal, imposed upon this court the exercise of original jurisdiction contrary to the provisions of the Constitution, and that therefore no appeal would lie.

■ The second of these grounds…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. American Insurance v. 356 Bales of CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Hornbuckle v. ToombsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Palmore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. United States v. DuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Anthony v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API