Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 24, 2014No. 69322-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

¶1 Johnson was involuntarily committed under Washington’s emergent detention statute, RCW 71-.05.153. Mental health professionals at Harborview believed that, because of Johnson’s mental disorder, she was gravely disabled and presented an imminent risk of serious harm to herself and others. The hospital detained her for an initial 72 hours, then petitioned for another 14 days of involuntary treatment. RCW 71.05.153 does not provide for judicial review of the initial 72 hour emergency detention. Johnson argues that it violated due process to commit her without the opportunity for judicial…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kitsap County Consolidated Housing Authority v. Kimbra Henry-levingstonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. DabbaghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Heidi Hazelquist v. StephanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. In Re The Detention Of Robert LoughCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State Of Washington, V. B.h.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API