Legal Opinion

State v. Navarro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 2016No. 15-1065PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

*824 This cases arises from an order of bond forfeiture issued after defendant failed to appear in court. The trial court denied surety's petition to remit and subsequent Rule 59(e) motion on the grounds that surety failed to demonstrate "extraordinary circumstances" which warrant relief from judgment. On appeal, surety principally argues that (1) in its order denying surety's motion to remit, the trial court failed to make sufficient findings of fact determinative of the ultimate issue, and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying surety's Rule 59(e) motion. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Tillman v. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nhung Ha v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API