Legal Opinion

Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Moraida

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1935No. 9567PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Special Chief Justice.

Appellant is a fraternal, beneficiary association, having a lodge system, with rep resentative form of government, with a ritualistic form of work, and is incorporated under the laws of the state of Nebraska, with its home office in Omaha, and has a permit to do business in the state of Texas. It professes to be organized for the purpose of and to carry on its business solely for the benefit of its members and their beneficiaries, and not for profit.

Angela G. de Moraida, appellee, is the widow of Tomas Moraida, and is the beneficiary named in a certificate issued…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Equitable Life Assur. Society of United States v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Knights of Pythias v. WithersSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. NewsomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp v. De MoraidaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Palmer v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Cochran v. Order of United Commercial TravelersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. SundayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API