Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Lee
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 17, 2017No. 1:16-CV-213 (LMB/JFA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District Judge
Before the Court is defendant Michelle K. Lee’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 30]. Plaintiff Fenyang Ajamu Stewart (“plaintiff’ or “Stewart”) has filed an opposition, [Dkt. No. 36] (“PL Opp.”), to which defendant has. responded, [Dkt. No. 39] (“Reply”). Although plaintiff has also improperly filed a surreply without first seeking leave of court, [Dkt. No. 40] (“Surreply”), the Court has considered it out of deference to plaintiffs pro se status. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted.
I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Deborah Katz Pueschel v. United States of America, Deborah Katz Pueschel v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Carolyn Sydnor v. Fairfax County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stewart v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020