Lapuk v. Blount
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The plaintiffs brought action against the defendant Blount for services rendered and materials furnished at Blount’s request in preparation of design and structural plans for an addition to a building owned by the Greene-Monroe Corporation. On application of Blount, the corporation was made a party defendant. A substitute complaint was filed in which it was alleged that Blount had incurred the obligation sued on as agent for the corporation, and judgment was rendered against the corporation; it has appealed. The word “defendant” as used herein shall refer only to the Greene-Monroe Corporation.
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Batter Building Materials Co. v. KirschnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Bachman v. FortunaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Montgomery v. LevySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc., George M. Hedla, Etc. v. Blaine McCool Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Design Development, Inc. v. BrignoleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. WR Grace & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
- Domizio v. DelahuntyConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
- Marks v. Estate of Mary Hutchinson, No. 316691 (Jan. 13, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995