Legal Opinion

Favor v. The People of the State of California

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided December 30, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00469Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 BRANDON FAVOR, Case No. 3:20-cv-00469-MMD-CLB 7 Petitioner, ORDER 8 v. 9 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 Petitioner Brandon Favor, a California state inmate, has filed a pro se petition for 13 writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1-1 (“Petition”)). This habeas matter is before the Court 14 for initial review under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.1 For the reasons 15 discussed below, the Petition is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Petitioner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Danny BOYD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. S. Frank THOMPSON, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API