Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Seashore Electric Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On demurrer to pl¡K*.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This suit is brought to recover the amount due on eight hundred and twenty-two interest coupons of $15 each, which had matured on bonds of the Seashore Electric Railway Company held by the plaintiff. The fourth plea of the defendant company sets up that these coupons were annexed to and were interest upon certain bonds made by the defendant to the American Loan and Trust Company as trustee, and payable to bearer; that this is the claim upon which the plaintiff’s declaration is founded, and that said bonds are secured by a mortgage upon…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Midland Steel Co. v. Citizens National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Edward C. Jones Co. v. Town of GuttenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  3. Birkins v. Seaboard ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
  4. Hall v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API