Legal Opinion

Sklaroff v. Weiner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeal, 291PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

While this is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 3 of Philadelphia County reassessing damages upon a judgment entered by confession in that court, the real controversy concerns the distribution of the proceeds of a sheriff’s sale of premises 3133 Euclid Avenue, Philadelphia, on a writ issuing out of the County Court of Philadelphia.

The appellant, Time Finance Company, is the assignee of a confessed judgment entered by Sklaroff on June 16, 1959, in the court of common pleas on a judgment note executed by the defendants Weiman and Weiner. As of the date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Renschler v. PizanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Moore v. Dunn & FellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Donaldson, to Use v. BielskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Herkowitz v. MolnickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frycklund v. WaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Metropolitan Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Keller, D. v. The Bank of NY MellonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Keystone Bank v. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Specialties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. MET. FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N v. BaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API