Legal Opinion

Unlimited Technology, Inc. v. Leighton

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Savage, J.

For purposes of applying the first-filed rule, which date governs the analysis — the date the concurrent federal case was filed in the state court or the date it was removed? The Third Circuit has not decided the issue. A few district courts, without analysis, have concluded that-the operative date is the date of removal. Other courts have used the date of filing in the state court. We conclude that the date the action was filed in state court is what counts.

Unlimited Technology, Inc., filed this action to enforce the restrictive covenants in defendant Richard…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dariz v. Republic Airline Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Monzo v. BazosDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Baird v. Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis, Co., LPADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. EQT CORPORATION v. WINGODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. MLI RX LLC v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API