Legal Opinion

Cote v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 26, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGenuno, J.

In this action for damages for personal injuries, arising out of an automobile accident, a jury has found for the defendants. Plaintiffs now move for a new trial, asserting that the rights of plaintiffs were seriously prejudiced by the trial tactics of defendants’ counsel. The specific grievance relates to the use, by defendants’ counsel, of a certain written statement admittedly signed by plaintiff William L. Cote. That statement contained an early version of the accident, given to his insurance company at or about the time of the accident. Knowledge of the existence of the statement having…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. People Ex Rel. Mooney v. Sheriff of N.Y. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Neugass v. Terminal Cab Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rintelen v. SchaeferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Murdock v. McCutchenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maiden v. Aid Carpet Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API