Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gelch v. State Board of Elections

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 19, 1984No. 84-320-M.P., 84-330-M.PPublished

1DissentMurray, Justice

I cannot agree with the result reached by the majority today. It is my opinion that the requisite qualifications for seeking *1220elective office in the State of Rhode Island are explicitly and exclusively set out in article XXXIX, section 1, of the Articles of Amendment to the Rhode Island Constitution. It is my firm conviction that any provision of a city charter or state statute that purports to supplement or modify the provisions of art. XXXIX, sec. 1, are unconstitutional.

It is conceded by petitioner that Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., did not lose his status as a qualified elector when he entered a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API