Legal Opinion

Breeze v. MacKinnon Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1905No. Docket No. 17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Case by Martha Breeze, administratrix of the estate of William Breeze, deceased, against the MacKinnon Manufacturing Company and the Michigan Central Railroad Company for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant MacKinnon Manufacturing Company set plaintiff’s husband at work upon a boiler which lay across the end of a railroad switch in its yard, upon which switching was done daily. It was obvious to •the plaintiff’s intestate that there was danger from the backing in of cars, and he talked to his co-laborer about it. He knew of and understood the danger as well as the defendants did, and chose to accept the situation. Under such circumstances the employer cannot be held liable upon the ground merely of a failure to furnish a safe place to work. The case is within the rule of Middaugh…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Middaugh v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Township of Pinconning v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API