Legal Opinion

Reinhart v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

147 N.J. 156 (1996)

685 A.2d 1301

TOBY EASTON REINHART, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 22, 1996.

Decided December 16, 1996.

Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for appellant (Michals, Wahl, Silver & Leitner, attorneys).

Fred Hopke argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

The narrow issue raised in this workers' compensation case is whether an improper use of a transcript of a prior workers' compensation proceeding was so prejudicial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  5. State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API