Reinhart v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
147 N.J. 156 (1996)
685 A.2d 1301
TOBY EASTON REINHART, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued October 22, 1996.
Decided December 16, 1996.
Sheldon Schiffman argued the cause for appellant (Michals, Wahl, Silver & Leitner, attorneys).
Fred Hopke argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.
The narrow issue raised in this workers' compensation case is whether an improper use of a transcript of a prior workers' compensation proceeding was so prejudicial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Close v. Kordulak Bros.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- State v. DeatoreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- State v. DiRienzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.