Legal Opinion

In re C.T.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 8, 1993No. 92-2394PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to amend an uncontested petition for adoption. We hold that there is no final judgment entered, and an appeal from an order denying a motion to amend is a non-final, nonappealable order, and dismiss the appeal.

In denying the motion to amend the trial court was under the impression that it had entered a final judgment in the adoption proceeding. However, when presented with the uncontested verified petition for adoption, the trial court entered an order denying the petition on the ground that the natural mother was not joined as a petitioner.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kreager v. GlickmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Armstrong Contracting & Supply Corp. v. Aerospace Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. In re the Adoption of StinebakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Yancey v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Millsaps v. Orlando Wrecker, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Florida Department of Revenue ex rel. A.L. v. S.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API