Armstrong Contracting & Supply Corp. v. Aerospace Industries, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant, a sub-subcontractor on a construction project, brought this action for a *243money judgment against his subcontractor, and the surety on the subcontractor’s performance bond. The surety filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for its failure to state a cause of action. The court endorsed upon the face of the motion to dismiss the words, “Motion Granted” signing and dating the same. This is the order from which plaintiff-appellant brings the appeal.
We are unable to consider the merits of the question presented. The “order” from which the appeal has been taken is one which at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pompano Paint Co. v. Pompano Beach Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Baker v. ColleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Shotkin v. DeehlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kreager v. GlickmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Danford v. City of RockledgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- In re C.T.D.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. WhyhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984