State v. Holden
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Justice.
The defendant by information was charged with mingling poison, to-wit, arsenic, with food with intent to injure and kill one Ernest Langenegger, contrary to the provisions of 1929 Comp., § 35-603. The jury returned a verdict of guilty at the' conclusion of the trial and the court imposed on defendant the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment from which he appeals.
The evidence connecting defendant with the crime is entirely circumstantial and his principal assignment of error is that the verdict is without substantial support in the evidence. The fact that Ernest Langenegger…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. ClementsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. McFerranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.