Legal Opinion

State v. Holden

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1941No. 4551PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The defendant by information was charged with mingling poison, to-wit, arsenic, with food with intent to injure and kill one Ernest Langenegger, contrary to the provisions of 1929 Comp., § 35-603. The jury returned a verdict of guilty at the' conclusion of the trial and the court imposed on defendant the mandatory sentence of life imprisonment from which he appeals.

The evidence connecting defendant with the crime is entirely circumstantial and his principal assignment of error is that the verdict is without substantial support in the evidence. The fact that Ernest Langenegger…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. BaileyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  4. State v. ClementsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. State v. McFerranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State v. GilletteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. AlderetteNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API