Laudato v. Landgarten
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUghetta, J.
There are presently pending before this court three applications to procure judicial approval of compromises of infants ’ causes of action. In two of these neither the guardian ad litem nor the infant are represented by counsel and papers submitting the proposed settlement to the court have been prepared by attorneys retained at the instance of defendants’ insurance carriers and who aré to be paid by those companies and in one, the guardian is represented by counsel of his own choosing.*
I am constrained to set forth my views as to the propriety of this procedure in view of the recent decision…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Bose v. WehrliNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of PequenoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- In re WillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armour v. BroadmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Fairfield Gloves v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Armour v. BroadmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954