Legal Opinion

State v. Furlow

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1992No. 13213PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Judge.

Michael L. Furlow was indicted for robbery, in violation of R.C. 2911.02(A). The indictment alleged that in committing a theft offense Furlow “did use force against * * * Clarence E. Brocke.” The indictment also contained a specification that Furlow had previously been convicted of robbery, an aggravated felony.

After a trial by jury, Furlow was found guilty of robbery and sentenced to eight to fifteen years imprisonment. On appeal, Furlow advances three assignments of error as follows:

“I. Appellant’s conviction for robbery should be reversed because the evidence adduced at trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. BallardOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Abdullah MansurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. BushOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. Pillow, 07ca095 (11-21-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. Ellis, Unpublished Decision (8-15-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. BrunnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API