Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Rules & Regulations Relative to Driver Training Schools

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 18, 1958No. 200738PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SATER, J.

Amended House Bill No. 159 enacted by the 102nd General Assembly, was embodied into §§4508.01 to 4508.07 inclusive, R. C., and §4508.99 R. C., with the title “Driver Training Schools” under Title 45, so embodied it became effective January 1, 1958. Statedly, none of these statutes is here challenged but some description of them is apposite to a disposition of this case.

Sec. 4508.01 R. C., defines “commercial driver training schools” and “instructors” therein. Sec. 4508.02 R. C., reads as follows:

*326“(A) The director of highway safety shall, subject to the provisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Standard "Tote" Inc. v. Ohio State Racing Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Ohio Department of Highway SafetyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API