Strickland v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentNye, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. I would adhere to our original decision and dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s motion for rehearing raises no valid arguments to show that we wrongly exercised our discretion when rul*460ing on his initial motion for extension of time.
The majority opinion on rehearing notes that we have written previously on matters concerning late-filed documents. See Rios v. State, 791 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989, no pet.); Guerra v. State, 766 S.W.2d 830 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989, no pet.); Gomez v. State, 763 S.W.2d 583 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1988, no pet.); De La Garza…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- De La Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
- Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Rios v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.