Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strickland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 1991No. 13-91-099-CRPublished

1DissentNye, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. I would adhere to our original decision and dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s motion for rehearing raises no valid arguments to show that we wrongly exercised our discretion when rul*460ing on his initial motion for extension of time.

The majority opinion on rehearing notes that we have written previously on matters concerning late-filed documents. See Rios v. State, 791 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989, no pet.); Guerra v. State, 766 S.W.2d 830 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1989, no pet.); Gomez v. State, 763 S.W.2d 583 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1988, no pet.); De La Garza…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  2. De La Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  3. Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Rios v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API