Legal Opinion

Guerra v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 19, 1989No. 13-88-358-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

UTTER, Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file the statement of facts. For the following reasons, we deny the motion and will consider the appeal without a statement of facts.

Appellant pled guilty to the offense of criminal mischief and the trial court assessed punishment at five years imprisonment plus a fine. Sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation on August 12, 1988. No motion for new trial was filed.

Tex.R.App.P. 54(b) provides that the statement of facts “shall be filed in the appellate court within sixty days after the day sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  2. De La Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Miles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Rios v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Rios v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API