Legal Opinion
Keith Saunders v. Ford Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2018No. 17-5277PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case involves claims by Keith Saunders against his employer, Ford Motor Company, under both § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and Kentucky law. Saunders contends that Ford breached the applicable collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by twice placing him on temporary leave— known as no-work-available . (NWA) status—and that his local union breached its duty of fair representation by failing to fully pursue his grievances. He also alleges that Ford retaliated against him by placing him on NWA status not long after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gary McNeal v. City of Blue Ash, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Thomas Baltrusaitis v. UAWCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Bonner v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Burton v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Clark v. UBSDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.