Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1932No. 22271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, C. J.

1. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the court’s refusal to allow a witness to answer a certain question, is too defective to be considered by this court, since it does not appear from the ground “that a statement was made to the court at the time, showing what the answer would be.” Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382 (2) (43 S. E. 712).

2. Special ground 2 of the motion (complaining of the admission of certain testimony) is not complete and understandable within itself. In order for this court to determine whether the admission of the evidence was error, it…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Reeves v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. McCall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Salter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API