Legal Opinion

Honley v. First Nat. Bank of Holdenville

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1913No. 4726PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeozm, Judge. Action between Frank Honley and another and the First National Bank of Holdenville. From the judgment, Honley and another bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents 'error from the district court of Seminole county, and is brought for the purpose of having reviewed errors alleged to have occurred on the trial of the cause. The motion for a new trial was denied on June 24, 1912, and the petition in error was not filed in this court until January 13, 1913, or a period of more than six months from the rendition of the judgment or order of which complaint is made. Chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1911, p. 35, provides that “all proceedings for reversing, vacating or modifying judgments, or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Healy v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Rolater v. StrainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Brooks v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Fairbanks-Morse & Co. v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Lewis v. KiddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawson Schreiner v. Davis Bros. Cheese CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API