Legal Opinion

York v. Reay

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 21, 1957No. 36,999PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Judge.

Appeal from an order denying a new trial in a will contest proceeding wherein the district court made findings that the will was not procured by undue influence and admitted the will to probate.

Since the existence of undue influence is a question of fact for the trier of fact,1 the sole issue upon this appeal is whether the findings of fact by the trial court are sustained by the evidence.

Testator Thomas Reay, an 85-year-old widower, died on June 28, 1955, a resident of Chippewa County. He was survived by a son, Arthur Ellis Eeay, and by two daughters, Clara and Mabel. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Fischer v. SperlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. In re the Estate of JernbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. In Re Estate of MarsdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Matter of Estate of CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. In Re Estate of ReaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Leuba v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Matter of Estate of OlsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API