Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of McCabe

Essex County Surrogate's Court

Decided February 23, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtHartshorns, J.

This is an application by two sisters, co-executrices of their mother’s will, to remove a third sister, also a co-executrix of such will, from her position as such, under section 149 of the Orphans Court act, as amended in 1921. 2 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p. 2625. Petitioners charge, as bases therefor, various acts of the respondent both before and after her qualification as executrix. Respondent insists that no acts previous to her qualification can be considered under the statute, and that bad faith therein is essential for her removal.

The statute cannot be so construed. It gives the court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  2. In re the Appeal of RobersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  3. Mackey v. MackeyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  4. In Re HanrettySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API