Legal Opinion

Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 28, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Cass District Court. — ■Hon. Walter I. Smith, Judge. This is a proceeding by motion to set aside a judgment, and a sheriff!s sale made thereunder. From the order of the district court overruling the motion, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The plaintiff commenced the action in which this proceeding was had in April, 1891, *68against W. J. Applegate and others, to recover the amounts due on promissory notes which they had made. An attachment was issued on the ground that the defendants were non-residents of the state, and levied upon certain real estate. The defendants did not enter ah appearance in the action, and in September, 1891, judgment was rendered for the sale of the land for the payment of something more than eleven thousand dollars due on the notes. In February, 1898, a special execution was issued on the judgment, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corn Exchange Bank v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Applegate v. ApplegateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. Kilmer v. GallaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. Wilder v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API