Legal Opinion

Payne v. Payne

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1958Published

1Opinion

On Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing

2Per curiam

The petitioner argues that the effect of our original opinion (215 Or 412, 332 P2d 1075) is to hold that a property settlement agreement made in contemplation of a divorce is never subject to challenge or rescission if its execution was induced by fraud, duress, mistake, or undue influence. We of course recognize the rule that the remedy of rescission is open to a party who has been induced to enter into a settlement agreement by inequitable conduct of the other party. *416Beaman v. DeShazor, Jr., 197 Or 669, 675, 255 P2d 157; Taylor v. Taylor, 154 Or 442,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feves v. FevesOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Payne v. PayneOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Beaman v. DeShazor, Jr.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API