Legal Opinion

(PS) Winston v. EDC Animal Services

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 4, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00923Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAREL WINSTON and ALMA MARIE No. 2:19-cv-0923 MCE DB PS WINSTON, 12 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 EDC ANIMAL SERVICES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Charel Winston and Alma Marie Winston are proceeding in this action pro se. 19 This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 Pending before the undersigned are motions to dismiss filed by defendant El Dorado 22 County Superior Court and defendant County of El Dorado. (ECF…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API