Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Ellis

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 2002No. 01-0590/NAPublished

1ConcurrenceBaker, Judge

I agree with Judge Effron’s factual recitation and legal framework for addressing the *384relationship between Issue I and Issue II; however, I join the conclusion in the lead opinion that appellant’s statement was voluntary and any error by the military judge in failing to provide an appropriate remedy in view of the lost evidence was harmless.

Although I agree with the result reached in the lead opinion, I write separately to address concerns I have about the way the result is reached. On Issue I, the majority opinion fails to capture or acknowledge the potentially coercive effect a threat to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API