Legal Opinion

Ford v. Garvin

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 29, 1974PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

127 N.J. Super. 391 (1974)

317 A.2d 425

IRAL FORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOHN W. GARVIN, JR. AND SAMUEL STERN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 19, 1974.

Decided March 29, 1974.

Before Judges HALPERN, MATTHEWS and BISCHOFF.

Mr. David Lustbader argued the cause for appellant Samuel Stern (Messrs. Lustbader and Lustbader, attorneys).

Mr. John Appezzato argued the cause for appellant John W. Garvin, Jr. (Mr. Joseph D. Darcy, attorney).

Mr. George F. Hendricks, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Pincus, Sheehan & Hendricks, attorneys; Mr.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salas v. WangCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. In Re Pago Pago Aircrash of January 30, 1974District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  3. Kotzian v. BarrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Wicks v. Central RR Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Weiman v. IppolitoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API