Legal Opinion

Richmond Cedar Works & Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Harper

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1921PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Norfolk county, in proceedings under the workmen’s compensation act. Judgment for claimants. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

The defendants in error, the widow and children of Leroy Harper, deceased, who lost his life while working as an em*483ployee of the Richmond Cedar Works, were adjudged compensation under the Virginia workmen’s compensation act (Acts 1918, p.-637). They have moved to dismiss the writ of error which has been allowed in this case, among other reasons, upon the ground that this court has no jurisdiction to review the judgment.

[1] We get little assistance from the numerous cases which have arisen in other jurisdictions, because of the differing methods of procedure and varying constitutional and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Self-Insurer's Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Tyson v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  3. Sullivan v. HaugMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Thaxter v. FinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Glenn's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  2. Humphrees v. Boxley Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Dillard v. Industrial Comm'n of Va.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rudacille v. State Commission on Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  5. Carnahan Oil Refining Company v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API