Legal Opinion
In re Huie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Involved here are claims for business damage and indirect real estate damage allegedly suffered by respondents as a result of construction of the Pep acton Reservoir. Respondent, Stilson A. Tweedie, has been engaged as an auctioneer and cattle dealer upon the premises involved in his claim since 1945. He was a lessee of the premises from 1945 until April, 1951 when he exercised an option to purchase the property contained in the lease. On July 13, 1956 he filed a business damage claim and on January 26, 1959 joined with his wife in filing a claim for business damage and for indirect real…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Adirondack Power & Light Corp. v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985