Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Shenango Furnace Co. v. Armson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1927No. 25,724PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Certiorari to review' the determination by the Minnesota tax commission of the occupation tax of The Shenango Furnace Company, the relator, for the mining operations of the year 1925. The tax commission refused to deduct from its valuation of the ore production of the Shenango and Webb mines so-called advance royalties which the relator claims it paid when it acquired assignments of leases of these mines along with the transfer of other property in 1906. Whether the commission erred in refusing to make the deductions claimed by the relator or deductions in some amount is the ultimate question.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  2. Lake Superior Consolidated Iron Mines v. LordSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State Ex Rel. Inter-State Iron Co. v. ArmsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. State Ex Rel. Shenango Furnace Co. v. ArmsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. ArmsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Susquehanna Ore Co. v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. the Shenango Furnace Co. v. ArmsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Corrigan, McKinney Steel Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. Susquehanna Ore Co. v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API