Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Susquehanna Ore Co. v. Bjornson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1935No. 30,179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

We adhere to our former decision in this case. The attorney general and the tax commission have very earnestly and very ably presented the reasons which they feel should persuade us to depart from the decision already rendered, but to do so we should have to overrule the cases which this court has decided over a series of years. The tax commission contends that consideration received for the assignment of a mining lease is not royalty unless the relation of landlord and tenant continues to exist between assignor and assignee and that in order to be royalty such consideration must be in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Shenango Furnace Co. v. ArmsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Susquehanna Ore Co. v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API