Legal Opinion

City of Spartanburg v. Willis

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 1916No. 9289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before SbasE, J., Spartanburg, January, 1915. From a conviction for violating the city ordinances of Spartanburg, the defendants, B. Willis, Grover Fowler, J. C. Wilson and C. M. Wall, appeal.

Read the full summary

Before SbasE, J., Spartanburg, January, 1915. From a conviction for violating the city ordinances of Spartanburg, the defendants, B. Willis, Grover Fowler, J. C. Wilson and C. M. Wall, appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. cite; As to taking testimony: Civil Code, secs. 3008, 3010; 63 S. C. 98. As to request to charge: 43 N. F. 710; 51 Pac. 1015; 58 Id. 796; 67 Id. 343. submit: It is no defense to a prosecution for an illegal sale of liquor that the purchase was made by a “spotter,” detective, or hired informer: 23 Cyc. 184; 172 111. 266; 50 N. E. 204; 49 Ind. 507; 113 Mich. 539; 112…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

These cases were heard together in this Court. The defendants were charged with violation of the ordinances of the city of Spartanburg against selling and transporting alcoholic liquors in the one case, in the other case with storing contraband liquors. In both cases the defendants were convicted in the mayor’s Court and sentenced. Appeals therefrom were taken to the Circuit Court and his Honor, Judge Sease, affirmed the judgment of the mayor’s Court, thereupon defendants appealed to this Court, and the defendants, Willis and Fowler,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  2. State v. WallerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API