State v. Batson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Moore, J., Greenville,-, 1917. Arthur Batson and others were convicted of illegal sale of liquor, and appeal. cites: 103 S. C. 334.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice FrasEr.
These three cases were heard together in this Court. The appellants were convicted of selling liquor. The only evidence against the appellants was the testimony of “specially employed State detectives, who went to the defendants under disguise and claimed to have purchased whiskey from them.”
1, 2 There is only one exception, and this exception questions the sufficiency of the testimony of a special detective to con vict the accused of the unlawful sale. We know of no binding authority that sustains appellants’ position. The only…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Spartanburg v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970