Legal Opinion

State v. Batson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 14, 1917No. 9764PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Moore, J., Greenville,-, 1917. Arthur Batson and others were convicted of illegal sale of liquor, and appeal. cites: 103 S. C. 334.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice FrasEr.

These three cases were heard together in this Court. The appellants were convicted of selling liquor. The only evidence against the appellants was the testimony of “specially employed State detectives, who went to the defendants under disguise and claimed to have purchased whiskey from them.”

1, 2 There is only one exception, and this exception questions the sufficiency of the testimony of a special detective to con vict the accused of the unlawful sale. We know of no binding authority that sustains appellants’ position. The only…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Spartanburg v. WillisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MaesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API