Legal Opinion
Redick III v. County of Tuolumne
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 15, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00453Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 1:25-cv-00453-KES-EPG 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE 11 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 12 COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., (ECF NO. 1) 13 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS 14 15 16 Plaintiff Stanley E. Redick, III proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action 17 filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 14). Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on March 21, 2025, 18 generally challenges Defendants’ alleged…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.