Legal Opinion

Dixon v. City of Mobile

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 21, 2003No. CR-02-0669PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Daniel Harris Dixon, appeals the dismissal of his de novo appeal to the Mobile Circuit Court. Dixon was convicted of violating municipal ordinance no. 39-1, by violating a "no-contact" order. (Ordinance no. 39-1 embraces § 30-5A-3(c)(1), Ala. Code 1975, part of what is commonly referred to as the Family Violence Protection Order Enforcement Act.) He was sentenced to 180 days in the city jail. Dixon then appealed the municipal court's ruling to the circuit court for a trial de novo. At the time that Dixon's case was called for trial, Dixon was not in the courtroom, and an alias…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Thornton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  3. State v. BibbyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  4. Riddle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. McCray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Prestwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex parte StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2016
  3. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. ALABAMA DEPT. OF MENTAL HEALTH AND RETARDATION EX REL. McCLOTHAN v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API