In re T.A.C.P.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
KOGAN, Justice.
We have for review an order of the trial court certified by the Fourth District Court of Appeal as touching on a matter of great public importance requiring immediate resolution by this Court. We frame the issue as follows:1
Is an anencephalic newborn considered “dead” for purposes of organ donation solely by reason of its congenital deformity?
We have jurisdiction.2 Art. V, § 3(b)(5), Fla. Const.
I. Facts
At or about the eighth month of pregnancy, the parents of the child T.A.C.P. were informed that she would be born with anencephaly. This is a birth defect invariably fatal,3 in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clay Elec. Co-Op., Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Waite v. WaiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- United States v. DempseySupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Krischer v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Estates of Perry v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.