Legal Opinion
Thomas v. City of Grand Junction
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1899No. 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
The purpose of this action, instituted by a taxpayer of the defendant city, is to restrain the city from the issuance of its bonds for the purpose of the construction of a new system *81of waterworks to be used in supplying tbe city with water. The judicial determination of the questions necessarily involved in the issues presented will also determine the question as to whether or not the city, under existing circumstances as presented by the record, has the power at all to construct a system of waterworks of its own. All of the questions are purely legal, the case having been presented and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hamilton Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Hamilton CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Merrill v. MonticelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brenham v. German American BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- White v. City of MeadvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Richardson v. FarwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by18 opinions
- Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Gamble v. Levitz Furniture Co. of the MidwestColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Krol v. CF & I SteelColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re PadillaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.