Legal Opinion

Hazzard v. Citizens State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7182PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

— Robert B. Carr made a promissory note, payable to the order of Hazzard, Murphy & Co., for the *131sum of $3,000, and the payees endorsed it to the Citizens State Bank of New Castle, Indiana. The bank sued Carr upon the note, and the latter successfully pleaded-usury to a part of the note.

This action was brought by the bank against Hazzard, Murphy & Co. to recover the amount which it failed to recover from Carr on the ground of the usury. The facts, we think, are sufficiently alleged in the complaint, to which a ■demurrer, for want of sufficient facts, was overruled.

Issues were joined, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Steinmetz v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Moss v. Witness Printing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Porter v. MillardIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Purcell v. EnglishIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Koerner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Board of Commissioners v. GarrigusIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Moore v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Gipe v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API