Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Malmstrom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hand, J.), dated August 2, 1990, as denied its motion for summary judgment against the respondents Walter W. Malmstrom and Chester Ross, individually and doing business as Malmstrom Ross Associates, Malmstrom-Ross Pontiac, Ltd., and Malmstrom-Ross Suzuki, Ltd.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the respondents’ answer and their counterclaims are dismissed in their entirety,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Albertina Realty Co. v. Rosbro Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Components Direct, Inc. v. European American Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Museums at Stony Brook v. Village of Patchogue Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Royce v. RymkevitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. HoovisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Pellicane v. Norstar BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Red Rock Holdings, Ltd. v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995