Legal Opinion

Opp v. TenEyck

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1884No. 11,213Published

From the Superior Court of Tippecanoe County.

1Opinion

On Petition for a Rehearing.

Zollars, C. J. —

That the liability of a surety is strictissimi juris, and not to be extended by construction, and that ita lex scripta est must control in deciding what the statute law is, are propositions well settled, and were not overlooked in the decision of the case. Nevertheless, when there is a contention as to the proper construction of a statute, it is always proper to consider what rights were intended to be secured, or what evils were intended to be provided against, by the legislation. Nor was the general rule overlooked, that where a new law covers the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. DronebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Malone v. McClainIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Hudelson v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Epstein v. GreerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API