Legal Opinion

United States v. Al-Nashiri

United States Court of Military Commission Review

Decided July 8, 2016No. CMCR 15-002Published

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

Mitchell, Presiding Judge:

This interlocutory appeal arises from the military judge’s decision “that excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a material fact in the proceeding.” 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(2). The procedural history of this case is described in United States v. Al-Nashiri, No. 14-001, slip op. at *2 (USCMCR June 9, 2016). The military judge excluded evidence as to

foreign nationals not on board the USS COLE (DDG 67) but located on the boats servicing USS COLE (DDG 67), individuals located on or around the refueling dolphin and any individuals on wharfs…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Loving v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API