Legal Opinion

Dairy Queen of Fairbanks, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1988No. S-1954PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Mark and Ralph Durante appeal from a jury verdict in a declaratory judgment action brought against them by Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers). The Du-rantes owned a Dairy Queen in Fairbanks that was destroyed on August 16, 1984 by an explosion and fire. Travelers denied coverage under a fire insurance policy on the bases of arson and false swearing. We affirm.

I. Facts and Proceedings.

The Durantes agreed to purchase the Dairy Queen in November 1983 for $950,-000. They concede that they immediately fell, into arrears because their debt service exceeded their income. At the time of…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hayseeds, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. City of Madison v. GeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Saxton v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hutt v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeNuptiis v. Unocal Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. RaymerAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. F.H. K.W.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Atlas Assurance Co. of America v. MisticAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API