Legal Opinion

Towles v. McCurdy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1904No. 20,330PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Hendricks Circuit Court; T. J. Cofer, Judge. Action by Mary E. McCurdy against Julia A. Towles and others to set aside the will of Elijah M. Tinder, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiff, two defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

A writing purporting to be the will of Elijah M. Tinder, deceased, was duly presented for probate in the Hendricks Circuit Court, Eebruary 24, 1902. No action was taken in the matter, but on Eebruary 26, 1902, Mary E. McCurdy, one of the appellees, prior to the admission of the supposed will to probate, filed her objections thereto in the manner and form required by the statute. The grounds upon which the probate was resisted were alleged unsoundness of the mind of the said Elijah M. Tinder, that the said will was unduly executed, and that it was executed under undue influence. Process was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. IshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Winters v. WintersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Kern v. KernIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Brackney v. FogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stayner v. NyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Heaston v. KriegIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Myers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Auld v. CathroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API